patching...
Update: Get the news on your digital doorstep- sign up for Santee Patch in your inbox each morning. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

MoveOn.Org Calls for Protest Rally at Duncan Hunter Offices in El Cajon

Members told that gatherings at noon Tuesday will express fear about Republicans driving “nation off an economic cliff.”

 

Update at 8:40 p.m. Monday: Rep. Duncan Hunter voted against the debt bill and told the Union-Tribune: "When we should be talking about what our military needs to keep us safe and prepare for future threats, there’s a misconception that security spending is what put the country in this fiscal sinkhole and the only way out is to cut national defense. … The future of U.S. security should not be handed over to a 12-person super panel. Its decisions or inability to reach an agreement could ultimately break our military or bring it very close to that point.”

Update at 6 p.m. Sunday: President Obama announced that a deal had been reached with congressional leaders to avoid a default. See this report for latest details.

Saying that “Republicans are about to push our nation off an economic cliff,” the liberal group MoveOn.org has called for a protest rally outside the district office of GOP Rep. Duncan D. Hunter at noon Tuesday.

Hunter—whose 52nd Congressional District includes La Mesa, Poway, Santee, Spring Valley and Ramona—will be among hundreds of targets of the activist group.

“Over the next 48 hours, we need to mobilize as many of our neighbors, family and friends as possible to demand the Republicans stop playing dangerous political games and do what's right for America,” MoveOn said in email to members Sunday morning.

MoveOn sent the email as Washington lawmakers continued to negotiate an increase in the nation’s debt ceiling—with a deadline of Tuesday to avoid a potential default.

The protests, MoveOn said, will show “our outrage that (Republicans have) held our whole economy hostage to force cuts to vital programs and to protect tax breaks for corporations and millionaires.”

The group added: “President Obama has repeatedly requested that we, the American people, ‘let Congress know’ how we feel. This is our opportunity to demand that Republicans in Congress support a plan that works for the American people—not just the rich and corporations.”

Hunter’s El Cajon office is at 1870 Cordell Court, suite 206 .

Robert Johnson

11:24 am on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Congress, both parties, have been pushing us toward the cliff for decades.
The economy does best when the federal government takes 18-20% of GDP.

Democrats and Republicans both get huge contributions from large corporations.
It's like watching two fat guys in a boat blaming the other for the boat sinking.

P.S. Sorry "fat guys in a boat" is not "politically correct", I should have said "two homo sapiens exceeding the federally mandated weight limitation for a personal watercraft"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean Purcell

3:57 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

@ Mr. Johnson
"P.S. Sorry "fat guys in a boat" is not "politically correct", I should have said "two homo sapiens exceeding the federally mandated weight limitation for a personal watercraft""

Now that's funny! In an argument as dumb as who's to blame for America's current financial mess (hint: look in the mirror), this was just the tweaking needed. Thank you!

Kathy

12:46 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Obama won't be happy until he completely destroys the U.S. Economy. The U.S. needs a strong, knowledgeable and U.S. Citizen to run our country, not a man who cries to the American people, to do his job, when he can't.

I say let's not pay the Senate or Congress a paycheck until they all grow up and do what is BEST for the AMERICAN PEOPLE. It is time for the American People to stand up for what they want, NO MORE DEBT, NO MORE WELFARE, NO MORE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

9:51 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

That is entirely logical. Cough, conspiracy theorist, cough, cough.

Stuart Strenger

1:37 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Let's see, Kathy. President Obama is the kind of person who gets delight in destroying his country's economy. And the majority of U.S. voters are so stupid as to believe that he is an American citizen simply because of a State of Hawaii birth certificate. And he cries to the American people to do his job. And you hope for no more help to people who can't afford subsistence living or medical care. Hmmmm. Well thought out and humane argument.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

4:17 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

I am so glad that you understand and agree with me on Obama agenda. I do not support providing welfare to mothers who popped out babies every year to stay on Welfare. I do not support providing living, medical and educational subsidies to illegal immigrants. Do you not care that a portion of your taxes pay for these expenses? I sure do, as well as many Americans. I also do not support unemployment benefits being extended more then 12 months. Is Obama not smart enough to realize that the reason these unemployment recipients continue to take this money, is that they will receive more on their unemployment, then going out and getting a job?

So yes, Obama is set on destroying the U.S. economic system.

Comment_arrow

Kathy

2:00 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Jeni, I don't think I stated that Welfare and Unemployment were exactly the same. However, if Joe Doe loses his job and was making $30K a year and now on unemployment, why would he go work a minimum wage job when he can receive substantially more through unemployment? What is the incentive to have Joe Doe go back to work unless he will earn more then his unemployment?

Comment_arrow

Kathy

2:51 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Jeni, why can't Joe Doe take the minimum wage job while continuing looking for the job he would prefer, matches his experience and provides the income he desires? At least he would not be draining on the unemployment system which fell short a year and half ago.

Comment_arrow

Claymore

9:00 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

'Bama does indeed want to tip the economy by overloading it and causing ruin, In case you haven't noticed, the liberals have done all they could to encourage people to go onto welfare and food stamps. Governments actually go public with pleas for this. He then gets to ride to the rescue by "remaking" America in the soviet model. He actually said that he wanted to destroy the American coal (and energy) industry, and yet he carried the state of Pennsylvania in the last election. People were emotionally invested in this turd, and are loath to admit an error and would rather go back to sleep. People doubt that he is American because his sensitivities and soul are un-American in nearly every way. He hates the country and likes it only to the extent that he is able to "remake" it. His words.

Doug Curlee

1:42 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

kathy..the reason obama is having trouble is that your tea party pals can't see anything except cut, cut, cut.. do cuts need to be made?..sure they do..but they don't need to be made on the backs of senior citizens, the aged, and the disabled..

you could damned near balance the budget with judicious military spending cuts..but that might cost the fat cat defense contractors to lose some money..

he's doing the best can, given the house idiocy he's faced with..

and get off the "birther" nonsense..that crap is so toally discredited by now that even rush limbajugh doesn't talk about it anymore..

doug

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

4:33 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Last I looked there was no Tea Cup in my hands. I just care about America and American Citizens and their future.

If you want to look at the persons responsible for Obama actions, just look at yourself and the idiotic Democrats who placed him in office. The man, I use this term loosely, has not achieved any of his promises of real importance. Therefore, he prays that his party can cause enough chaos with their untruthful accusations and scare tactics, to distract from the economical downfall he has caused our country.

Doug, you always have the same opinion because you have been in the media most of career and the media protects Democrats. Why, because the media rarely is truthful.

Comment_arrow

Ted

7:50 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

They can cut all thy want and create all the credit they want but there will be no economic recovery until this country brings back the industries that made us wealthy.

Comment_arrow

IH8whitepages.com

10:36 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

The 2011 military budget including everything like m housing is around $680Billion.
The current budget is $1.5 Trillion in the red.
So how, even if you were willing to live without a military, would that " damn near" balance the budget?

Comment_arrow

IH8whitepages.com

12:06 pm on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Doug, you never responded to me re the military budget not being even close , let alone " damn near " to balancing the budget.
So how about this one : Since your answer to the problem is TAX TAX TAX, please name one City State or Country that has taxed its way to prosperity ?

Comment_arrow

Claymore

9:13 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

Obama the Merciful and his allies, who have controlled the government for the first 2 years of his reign, have spent, spent, spent, jacking up the size and cost of government, and all you can come up with is "cut the military?" The only constitutionally mandated purpose for government set forth specifically. The Tea Party Patiots recognize that we are a highly-taxed people, and the size of government needs to be shrunk, instead of assessing ever higher taxes. There is no end to it. We don't want to be remade under the communist/progressive model. You and your comrades and commissar masters have had your day. Even though we, in California, now live behind the new Iron Curtain, we have hope for the nation outside of Soviet California.

john

2:14 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

in my 50+ years living in the USA i have never seen such a divided country. it only took 10 years of war to bankrupt the economy. Obama campaigned on ending the war, well who is holding to his pledge? are you really any better off than 4 or even 8 years ago? do you accually wake up each day and feel confident about your immediate future? And people thought it was bad during the cold war. At least then you figured you'd just be dead if there was nuclear holicast. Now you must live with the reality that you will sacrifice and suffer for another 5 years if Obama is once again put into office.

Reply

Stanley Toncich

3:40 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

MoveOn.org is kidding, right? What pushing us over the 'economic cliff' is uncontrolled, unrestrained federal spending to prop up the Welfare-Warfare State, and collectivists like MoveOn should be happy with that.
Let's be clear, our debt is over 14 TRILLION, and the Fed's are borrowing $0.40 on every dollar spent (from yesterday's U-T) AND, the bulk of 'baby boomers' like myself have not yet retired or started really taking money out of the system. Wait until that happens, our nation will collapse. We can not tax our way out of this mess without ruining our nation or our standard of living.
The 'progressives' have ruined America in my lifetime. We've gone from being the world's biggest creditor to its biggest debtor in ~50 years. We have a huge trade deficit, can't control our borders, and we send our kids all over the world to be maimed or killed as policemen or social workers in undeclared wars of seemingly infinite duration.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim T

8:53 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Well stated Stanley. Concur!

Comment_arrow

Claymore

9:18 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

Well put, brother. Obama the Merciful is waging war on the American economy, and we will resist.

Rick Haseltine

5:41 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

I am for Hunter and against Obama. Lets impeach the Obama the lying socialist

Reply
Comment_arrow

Selina Forte

8:19 am on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Impeach the President on what grounds?

Comment_arrow

Kevin Hippensteel

5:10 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

If you voted for Obama to prove your not racist, next time vote for anyone else to prove your not an idiot.

Mike Smith

5:53 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

It's too bad there are so many people in this country that do not understand the facts of our current situation.

1. President Obama is a citizen this is not open to debate or opinion
2. The United States was trillions of dollars in debt way before President Obama came into office.
3. President Obama prevented a total meltdown of the economy by keeping US auto companies from going bankrupt and by keeping most of the large banks in business. In a Teaparty world letting these institutions go out of business would have been catastrophic.
4. If we are really worried about trade deficits we would have a more sane energy policy and trade polices. How ever this is not in the best interest of oil companies and multinational companies that export labor oversea were they can exploit lower cost labor and tax revenue the government needs to function.
5 Only cutting Federal spending is not even a close solution to our budget problem because bond holders would still need to be paid.
6. Anti immigrant xenophobia is unjustified. If all the people in this country that were here illegally staged a national strike it would bring our economy to a grinding halt at worse or cause a famine at best. The 9/11 hijacker entered this country using legal visas mostly from Saudi Arabia.
7. Democrats and Republicans must reach a compromise and increase the debt limit lest we face a credit down grade and much higher interest rate for the government.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

7:59 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

4. I don't think you have to be a genius to know why the larger Corporations go overseas. Why wouldn't they go overseas where the taxes are significantly lower, as well as, lower cost labor? If the Democraps have it their way, they want to increase the large Corporations taxes even higher, so more of them leave our country. Why does the government allow other countries to come drill for oil in our country? Does it not make sense to kick their butts out and drill here, for ourselves?
5. Agree
6. I would be more than happy to take the chance. The illegal immigrants take American jobs because they are willing to work for less, are paid under the table, therefore no payroll taxes or work comp cost. The employer has no obligations to pay any type of benefits, also. Illegal immigrants come across the border and commit crimes knowing that they will just be exported with no consequences. I cannot tell you HOW MANY illegal immigrants drop into our ER departments and receive FREE medical care. They also manage to somehow get onto or welfare and Medicare systems by all of their illegal tactics. So, please, kick them out of OUR country and let’s see what happens, I can only see IMPROVEMENT.
7. Increasing our Debt Level is NOT the answer. When do we stop increasing it and at what costs? Obama is fighting hard to be re-elected and therefore trying to put all the blame on the Republicans. Hopefully, the American people can see through his smoke screen.

Comment_arrow

Kathy

7:59 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

1. Exactly who are you to decide it is not open for debate? Why is it that it took so long for Obama to provide a supposedly legal birth certificate? If he had nothing to hide, he should have provided it immediately, not half through his, hopefully last term.
2. Agree but Obama certainly hasn't helped in improvement, only in increasing the national debt.
3. This is a total laugh. The money he provided these companies does not do ANYBODY good except for the greedy corporate heads of these companies. Have you been hiding in a cave? Have you not noticed that just about nobody can achieve a home loan? Foreclosures have almost tripled since our Not So Great Leader gave unreasonable loans to the banking industry. Credit Card Interest Rates has almost double, even for consumers that have a perfect credit score. We had NO BUSINESS lending ANY MONEY to these Corporation, all it did was cost more jobs, more foreclosures, and longer unemployment, home sales decreased by 92%, and increased the national debt. However, it did allow these Corporation to pay huge Bonuses to their officers.

Doug Curlee

5:54 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

kathy.. your preconceived notions will bring you to grief one day..you assume i'm a democrat.. i'm not.. you assume i protected democrats during my career..i can find you a LOT of angry democrats who didn't like what i said about them..you assume the media protects democrats, and that's not true, either..it's just that the media has, for the most part, finely tuned bulls*** detectors, and are not afraid to use them..on anyone..and where most of the bulls*** is coming from these days is from the tea party republican side of the political spectrum..

i rather suspect, in the wake of this mess over the deficit, a great many of those tea party types are gonna be what they call "one and done"..thjey will have accomplished NOTHING they tolld the voters they'd do.. and the voters will send tham back to whatever they did before their two-year vacation in washington, d.c...

doug

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

8:02 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Well Doug then I guess you agree with everything that Fox News has to say.

DDAMM

6:01 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

I hope the country defaults on its debt, because unfortunately this nation really needs a wake up call. This is also more than just one parties fault its both sides fault and they're both acting like children.

Reply

Al Garrett

7:03 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Hey Doug,
Glad to see you're hanging around making small talk with the rest of us.

Unfortunately, defense only accounts for about 5% of our GDP so even eliminating the entire process would do little to balance the budget.

Nobody's plan, so far, has offered to make the cuts on the backs of the elderly and disabled. There have been offers to reduce the amount of GROWTH in some senior programs, as in, give a 2% COLA instead of 5%. A paltry raise is better than a total freeze, or a cut, right?

Kathy's point about your odds of being a Democrat is made from experience. No HONEST main stream broadcast associate has ever denied that broadcast news, and some in cable, tilt left of center in their coverage. You are in the main stream media, therefore the odds that you are a Democrat are about 90-10. The terms you use to describe the Tea Party movement pretty much cement your belief system firmly to the left.

How about this?
10% across the board cut in this year. 2.5% for the next four years.
There's enough fraud and waste to cut at least 20%.
10 year hiring freeze. Promote from within when promotion is necessary. Consolidate offices when personnel are thinned out.
10 year pay raise freeze. Period. Except military and they get 2%/year.
10 year no new tax hikes. Period. Reduce home mortgage interest deduction by 5%/year for 5 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug Curlee

7:15 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

well, i'll tell you what, al..i've been around newsrooms for 42 years and more.. and every one i've been in, or worked in, is decidely right in the middle..because they HAVE to be..

i may seem leftist to you, because i can see both points..again, because i have to..in fact, i'm a registered non-partisan, and always have been..i talk the way i do about the tea party movement because i believe they are the true danger to america..thankfully, as i said, many will be going home to stay after the 2012 elections.. they have NOT covered themselves with glory in this debacle..

doug

Kathy

8:08 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

The Tea Party stands for TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTISM.

Doug, if I remember correctly you are retired. Therefore, you no longer need to lie, you can start telling the truth. The News Media has NEVER been in the middle, unless you consider them in the middle of the Democrat Party, with the exception of FOX News.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug Curlee

10:15 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

kathy.. i consider fox
news" to be two things..(a)- undeserving of the title "news".. and (b) the paid public relations arm of the right wing of the republican party..

that outfit has been caught in so many blatant lies that, if the government licensed "news" operations, fox would have lost that license years ago...

the news media has been in the middle all along.. it's just that the country has become so polarized that anyone who doesn't share the tea party view is aupomatically labeled radical leftists..no matter what their beliefs might actually be..

you should consider that it's basically those comparative few against the vast majority of the american public...and i think the 2012 elections will prove that beyond any possible doubt..

doug

Comment_arrow

Al Garrett

7:31 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

I'm no Fox defender but having watched news channels for years, I can safely say that if you still have the “Hate Fox” attitude, then you aren't watching cable to hear news, you're watching to hear your own opinions get airtime.

The only way to be honest is to watch ALL news outlets and see which one actually does have opposing viewpoints on air and which ones are really just “paid public relations arm of the left wing of the Democratic party..” to use your own words.

Media has been firmly left-leaning for at least 50 years and hard left for the last 10. I don't mind. I have the free will to choose to watch whatever I wish and make my own mind up based upon my own research. If you hate Fox because your favorite news channel competes with (and also hates) Fox, then you're simply being disingenuous.

Al

Comment_arrow

james hernandez

11:11 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTISM? Lets see, they want to cut all the middle class programs BUT still pay all the tea partys farm subsides? Google how many of the tea party people & republicans get these subsides, it is a large sum. When we were on the curb in 2005 protesting going to war, people who are now the TEA PARTY were on the other side calling us, UNGODLY, UNAMERICAN, UNPATRIOTIC AND WE DON'T SUPPORT THE TROOPS. Why weren't you complaining about the debt then?

Comment_arrow

Kathy

11:45 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

James, War Protesters totally disgust me. These protestors sure like living in our country where we have freedom. Are you and these protestors, so delusional that you think you would have your freedom if it was NOT for our Military? I suppose you would like to see us dismantle our military and allow anyone to come in and repeat 9/11?

Comment_arrow

james hernandez

12:22 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Certianly your not part of stupid america that feels saddam hussein had anything to do with 9/11? If you are then you are part of the debt problem because that was the beginning of this debt we are talking about, it is really funny how you repubs spin things, Iraq had nothing to do with our freedom, any idiot knows that but your spin makes it sounds like Iraq was threatening to come over and take your costco card.

Comment_arrow

Bryceson Cabading

1:10 pm on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

The only thing the Tea Party has showed is that they are uneducated.. Looks at any of their leaders- Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann- do they seem smart to you?

Al Garrett

9:04 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Thanks for the reply, Doug.
I don't want to be, or seem, argumentative but saying you're non-partisan doesn't necessarily indicate your non-partisanship-ness. Anyone can register non-partisan and still believe the left (or right) party line is the correct one for the country.

Let's do a quick question & answer to see where you stand:

TEA Party - Taxed Enough Already. Do you feel we need higher taxes in this country? Or is this the danger they represent in the Tea Party?

Obamacare - Do you feel taxpayers should pay more for their own health care in order to pay for health care for those that can't, or won't, pay for it themselves?

Business - Do you feel some businesses make "obscene" profits and therefore they should be extorted into paying more (in the form of taxes or penalties) for the privilege of doing business in this country?

Unemployment - Do you feel it's the governments job to create jobs using taxpayer money or should they get out of the way and let the free market create jobs?

Any of you other readers lurking out there....feel free to jump in.

Al

Reply

Doug Curlee

10:08 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

i'll play your game, al..
tea party?- we don't need higher taxes.. we need people who don't pay their share to pay up..

obamacare?- i think we need a national health care system so that EVERYONE can get the care they need..

bjusiness?- yes, some businesses DO make obscene profits, and the use of the word "Extorted" is a nice try to muddy the issue, but not relevant here- the rich need to pay the same proportionate taxes as the rest of us..

undemplolyment?- since the rich "job creators" are NOT creating jobs, i'd rather have the government do it than have people starve..the fre market isn't creating jobs for amerricans..china, korae and taiwan are doing quite well indeed, though..

does that make me an ultra liberal?..probably by your lights.. i see it as a sensilbe approach to the problems..and fair to all..

doug

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

10:33 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Doug, I am NOT surprised by your response, as you are without a doubt a Radical Left Wing Supporter, regardless of how you are registered. It is no secret that many Democrats register as Non-Partisan, in order to throw off the Republican votes. I guess you are one of them.

Come on Doug, you've been in the Media long enough to know that lies and bad news sells quicker. Do you never watch the news anymore?

I pray that in 2012, the people take back their government and vote in a American President that truly cares about the people and not that they were the "First". After all, that is why Obama won, he was the "First" and brought in votes from people that might not or ever had, voted. Unfortunately, they did vote for all the WRONG reasons.

Comment_arrow

Al Garrett

6:58 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

If you want to continue the discussion, I'd follow up with:

Who isn't "paying their fair share" of taxes? Is it the bottom 50% who pay nothing or the top 5% who pay almost 60%?
I believe everyone should have some skin in the game, even if it's only a few dollars. We all use facilities and services, we should all pay something.

Obamacare is great in theory but without a balance of free market principles, it is doomed to fail. Why wouldn't Congress put in tort reform or choices to go outside state lines like we do with auto insurance?

Government can only exist with profitable businesses to support it. Is there a level of taxation at which you would be satisfied that businesses are paying enough? If there is, then you've validated my point about extortion. To punish a business for being successful by raising taxes or applying what amount to fines such as a "windfall profits tax" is only a cute way of saying "If you want to make a huge amount of money in this country, you have to pay us off to leave you alone." That's extortion.

Unemployment would drop like a rock if businesses knew where the country was heading in the future. It isn't going to rebound until the people running the company can be assured that folks like yourself aren't going to punish them for being successful.

If President Obama stood behind the lectern and said, "No tax increases for the next 10 years!" businesses would be hiring left and right and the unemployment would plummet.

Response?

Comment_arrow

Al Garrett

6:59 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

It wasn't intended as a "game" Doug, just a way for two people to get to know where each other stands. Sort of like meeting at a political rally and learning about each other's beliefs.

I tend to see our country as follows: Very few people fall strictly on the left or right of any given subject. If you remember the classic bell curve, the majority of folks would be within one standard deviation of the middle. The folks at the extreme far right and far left make up the minority of the population. I'm betting if we continue this, there are probably a few areas where we might agree.

That being said, your responses to my earlier questions DO cause you to be seen as firmly on the left side of center but I wouldn't say "ultra-liberal". Nothing you answered is what most would consider center or right of center by most average Americans. All your answers were left-leaning only. Unfortunately, every time your ideas for fixing the economy have been tried throughout history, the failure has been resounding.

I hope we can continue to dialog about this. At the very least, we may be serving a well-mannered debate to other folks watching the thread.

It will take a second post to respond because I'm so long-winded.

Al

Mike Smith

11:34 pm on Sunday, July 31, 2011

Why do people fear and hate non documented workers? They tend to do the jobs that most Americans refuse to do. As an American would you clean offices, harvest food, pick up trash, mow lawns, clean cars, make less than minimum wage, live in fear of deportation, be held for ransom until your relatives paid or you are killed, be treated than less than human because ultra right wing people are trying to move us away from democracy toward a right wing cult of personality police state? Xenophobia against undocumented workers is not what this country was founded on. We are a nation of immigrants legal and undocumented. Be the American we should be not a nightmare of extremes and fear.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

1:08 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

I am a law abiding U.S. Citizen and proud of my country. If you choose to not abide the laws of our country, then I guess that is your choice.

I want ALL illegal immigrants removed from the United States of America. If they want to live here so bad, then have them enter our country, LEGALLY, otherwise stay the hell out.

Comment_arrow

James Jones

2:09 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Is this really an invitation to discuss this topic? If so, just simply explain why immigration into this country should be open and unregulated? If possible, try not to accuse me of being a racist or a hater or an ultra right-wing kook just because my opinion probably differs from yours.

Mike Smith

4:19 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

I am also a law abiding citizen that has served a short time in the military, pay taxes and served on jury duty. My opinions are given as a free citizen of the America that I believe in that extends the blessing of liberty and freedom to everyone that lives with this nation regardless of their document status. To deny freedom to anyone is to some day deny freedom to yourself.

Reply

Lynne Mollay

8:35 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

This is a good article Jeni. Let's hope some of the protagonists here will read it with an open mind. There are always 2 sides to each issue and we need to see both of them in order to accomplish anything in this country. The Congress and Senate are more concerned about getting re-elected than they are about fixing the problems that our government has. I love this country and hope that we can someday get back to civility.

Reply

tom Comeau

8:55 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

The American empire is imploding and the best indicators are the comments contained at this site. In a word we are over-extended! That's the real cause of our dilemma. We have no business attempting to straighten out the world or to infuse each nation with our 'values' (freedom) and methods (capitalism). We are hypocrites and interlopers and everybody hates both. Both parties are at fault in elevating greed to a virtue and the only predictable thing is that they'll blame each other endlessly, much like school children and with the same results. We need new blood in the game and that calls for a third party which, if nothing else, will point to how silly the two-party system has been. There's never been a good argument for our views to be represented by two parties alone; and the longer the process is allowed to continue, the more alike the two parties become with the outcome being that we'll still have our wars but they'll be called non-wars by one side or police actions by the other with exactly the same drain on our resources and lives. Nader was right, there is no difference between the two major parties. We've reached the point where we have to take a serious look at our governing mechanism and make some major changes. The solutions are out there; all that's lacking is the will and courage to employ them.

Reply

Doug Curlee

9:23 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

tom..all you're asking for is a major overhaul of the united states constitution..no big deal..:-)

you're right.. some things do need to change.. which doesn't mean it's going to easy to do..getting approval of 2/3 of the congress, and then 3/4 of the states to agree on anything is a task maybe beyond anyone's ability..

third parties have a very bleak history in this country.. and that isn't going to change..because third parties generally have very little access to the mother's milk of politics..money.. lots and lots and lots of money..

as for the wars..well, whose watch did these happen on?

doug

Reply
Comment_arrow

tom Comeau

11:35 am on Monday, August 1, 2011

Doug,
The fact that the history of third parties is not filled with success is no proof that it can never happen, unless, of course, we all take the view that it can't happen, which plays directly into the hands of the reigning parties. Anything can happen and will happen if the right combination comes together and it doesn't have to be just about money although that is unquestionably a big part of it; the "revolutions" in the MIddle east sprang from other than money. Revolutions have a very poor history in this nation, except for its beginning, but if enough people have their backs to the wall, you'll see a demonstration of what it means to "have nothing left to lose".
As to wars, they've happened on both "watches" and only serve to illustrate the similarity of both major parties. "Wars are rackets" and both parties love the rackets.

tom Comeau

12:28 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Kathy you're hatred of war protestors says a lot more about your ignorance than anything else. Our over-extended military has very little to do with our freedoms which existed well before we decided to involve ourselves in these multiple wars. This tie-in of the military with our freedoms is the biggest batch of bull---- to come down the pike in a century and is repeated endlessly by people incapable of thinking for themselves. Assuming you're in that group, let me assist you in understanding that none of the wars since WW2 have had anything to do with our freedoms except as some right wing wackos saw communism as the bugaboo of the day. I fought in Korea and Vietnam and both had zero to do with our freedoms or imperiled us in any way. We lost 58,000 of our troops supposedly "fighting communism" in Vietnam and there's yet no one, in or out of government, that can explain why. It certainly had nothing to do with our freedoms! Those troops died for exactly NOTHING! Vietnam decided to consolidate as a communist nation, hence we failed and our troops died in vain. Both should be used only in the most dire of circumstances. Even 9/11 was not occasion for going to war; it was not he work of a nation, which is the entity with which we go to war. You can't declare war against individuals anymore than you can against drugs. You are responding to propaganda which is what egged on this so-called "war on terror" which is the ultimate warmonger's dream since it is endless.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

4:01 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Tom, I do feel very sorry for you and the anger you are holding onto. I think you have misplaced the blame.

Say what you want but the MILITARY IS THE PRIDE OF MY COUNTRY, maybe not yours, whatever that my be.

Doug Curlee

1:18 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

tom.. i was there, too..

and i can't begin to explain why..

welcome home, brother..

doug

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

1:32 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

O.K., so are you and Tom are now Military Haters? Geez, wake up and STOP insulting and START being respectful those that have and those that are currently serving our country. GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY, YOU ARE THE PRIDE OF AMERICA.

Comment_arrow

tom Comeau

3:38 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Doug,
A day doesn't go by that I don't talk to myself about that 58,000 number. I say it very slowly and try to wrap my mind around that number of men, husbands, brothers, fathers, uncles, cousins, etc. I end up very bewildered and very angry.

And to Kathy,,the military are NOT the pride of the country, they are the cannon fodder OK? Pinning a few tin medals on a person doesn't make him the pride of the country and getting him killed for nothing is also not a moment of pride.

Comment_arrow

tom Comeau

3:42 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Doug,
Likewise on the welcome home brother!

james hernandez

1:42 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Why don't we get Halliburton to pay back some of the billions of dollars that they took(was given by Dick cheney thru no bid contracts) from the Iraq war to settle some of this debt, since that was the main reason to go to war. Why won't Bush and cheney go outside the USA? possible arrest warrants?

Reply

Dennis

1:43 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

We are already "off the cliff" - the debt amount is insane - It was reported recently that if we spent no money at all, it would take about 389 years of revenue to cover just the interest on the debt - if I remember right. We can't run our houses like this - my grandparents would turn over in their graves if they saw what our country has done economically - they had to wait to buy things, and had to live conservatively - no new cars, no flashy clothes, 1 working tv, ---

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

2:07 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

I will agree Dennis. I think Credit has been the biggest downfall of this country. Credit Cards should of NEVER been created, as most, do not have the discipline, especially our Government. My 84 year old Mother has NEVER had a credit card in her entire life and owes NO ONE. She is a firm believer, if you don't have the money, then you don't spend it. Americans are extremely spoiled and have lowered their values. WE MUST set an example for our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren, do give away, what you don't have.

Doug Curlee

2:29 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

kathy..since you advocate respect fro those who have served and are serving, i'm sure i can expect your sincere apology for calling me names in a couple of your previous missives..

thank you in advance..

doug

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

3:46 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Ah Doug, not going to happen until you show respect to our Military and appreciate what the Military are doing for you and your country. What's wrong Doug, were you drafted and your current feelings are showing anger for that?

tom Comeau

3:26 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Kathy, you're so typical of the tunneled vision breed you belong to that you immediately jump from a criticism of the military to hatred of the military. Your black and white world is what prevents you from seeing any other viewpoint other than your own. I spend no time hating the military, I spend a lot of time criticizing how it is employed and by whatever you hold dear, I have a full right to do so! I buried a few of my buddies.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

3:54 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

then show your patriotic buddies some respect. In case you don't understand, criticizing is disrespecting the Military.

I do believe that before ANYONE becomes President and Commander and Chief, they should of served their country through our Military. Hum, did Obama or Clinton serve? Let's see, Clinton was a draft dodger and Obama couldn't even provide a valid birth certificate within 30 days of becoming President, so we know, he certainly didn't serve.

Comment_arrow

Craig Maxwell

5:56 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Kathy,
Remember that Abraham Lincoln, thought by most to be our greatest President, and the Commander-in-Chief who led us through our greatest conflict, had no military background.

tom Comeau

4:06 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Kathy, there's no call for unequivocal respect for the military anymore than there is for the Congress or the Supreme Court. Coating the military with respect, whether or not it deserves it, is to lessen the meaning of the word. The military is a large and very impersonal agency that doesn't care one whit whether you respect it or not; neither does the Congress or the Supreme court or the CIA for that matter.
There's never been a shortage of individuals who profess respect for the military just as there's no shortage of those who ignore the needs of the wounded veterans or the fallen soldier's families. Hypocrisy runs rampant and it's not confined to our politicians.
You're the one who should apologize for your abysmal ignorance concerning the military and the more so because I suspect that it's willful ignorance.

Reply

Mike Smith

4:12 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Mr Curlee is a Vietnam veteran according to his profile information. He deserves our respect and gratitude. You honor us sir. This is a democratic republic that puts the control of the military in the hands of civilians that have pledged to protect and defend the constitution. We are not a military dictatorship. President Obama proved his citizenship by undergoing an FBI background check that all presidential candidates must pass. Certain people are entitle to their opinions. However, they have no basis in fact or common practice.

Reply

tom Comeau

4:13 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

More of your ignorance on display; criticism is in no way disrespectful, unless you're of the opinion that the military can make no mistakes. Our form of government is based on the right to criticize those in power and that doesn't preclude the military. It occurs to me that you're too ignorant to carry on an intelligent conversation.
As for Cowards of the first order, there's plenty in both political parties but you forgot to mention Cheney and his friend IdiotBush who, with his connections, had no fear of being sent to the front lines.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy

4:35 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Hum Tom, you must of forgot, Cheney was VP not President. So you think just because a person in the U.S. Military is not out on the front lines, then they really didn't serve, is that what you believe?

I think you and Doug should go to lunch and talk about your self-righteous attitudes and how worthless you both feel our Military is. I am done trying to bring you & Doug to your senses, a total waste of time.

tom Comeau

4:20 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Kathy, what serves as "the pride of your country" is and always will be the least of my concerns as I have very little respect for your opinions, even when you can rightfully claim them as your own instead of the parroting of the opinions of others. And it's my country as much or more than it is yours.

Reply

tom Comeau

6:07 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Oh , that's a great argument Kathy, Cheney was VP and not the president ; as if that erases his five deferments. Where did you learn the art of argument anyway, in kindergarden? Bush didn't serve anyone but himself while in the Air National Guard in which he landed due entirely to the intervention of his well-connected daddy. You don't know enough about the history of your country to argue with anyone. No mention was made by me or Doug about the "worthlessness" of the military; that's entirely your construct as it is with most of you witless Republicans. You simply don't understand the meaning of the word criticize, in fact you understand very little else, which is why further conversation with you is pointless.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug Curlee

9:25 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

sorry to point out your endless inaccuracies, kathy.. but that's anothrer one..

they don't draft officers..you have to work at it.

doug

Patch_comments_icon

Ken Stone

8:41 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

Story is updated with Hunter comment after he voted "no" on the debt bill.

Reply

Kathy

9:47 pm on Monday, August 1, 2011

UPDATE RESPONSE:
I couldn't agree with you more, Duncan Hunter. Duncan Hunter For President, A Real Man that stands for the American People and Our Military. A Real Man that does not succumb to peer pressure. A Real Man that does not cry to the American People when he is incapable of accomplishing promises he made. A Real Man that does not use scare tactics. A Real Man who served in our Military. Duncan Hunter is a Real Man.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Selina Forte

8:32 am on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Hunter voted against modernizing the FDA, voted against the Mine Safety Act, voted against the expansion of CHIP, just to name a few. He embodies the "Party of No" and in my opinion, he isn't qualified to be a representative, much less president.

Batman

10:05 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

My uncle was killed fighting the Korean War in 1952. Even though this happened 10 years before I was born I could see it was the worst thing that ever happened to my dad. My grandmother never got over the loss. For many years I thought my uncle's death was a complete waste and we had no business getting involved in the Korean conflict. Until I learned of the plight of the North Korean people under communist dictator Kim Jiong Il. No electricity, no transportation, NO FOOD! I know now my uncle is a hero. "Mr. Ill" and every other two-bit dictator knows the only thing standing in their way is the United States of America. And they will do anything to bring us down. DON'T BE A PART OF THEIR PLOT!

Reply

tom Comeau

10:32 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

There's never been a shortage of ignorance in this nation and that's why we're so easily stampeded like mindless cattle into so many illegal and unnecessary wars. Neither Korea nor Vietnam was any of our business nor presented any danger to us at any time. Your uncle was cannon fodder just like the rest who died. Now go drink some Kool Aid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Batman

11:20 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Oh, you one of Mr. Ill's henchmen?

Comment_arrow

IH8whitepages.com

10:34 am on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

How charitable and understanding of you .
Don't you libs pride yourself on your " sensitivity" ?
Cannon fodder ? Kool Aid indeed.
You make me sick.

Doug Curlee

10:37 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

jim.. no one will agrue with that.. up to a point..

what some of us, even us veterans, have a lot of trouble with is our ongoing destgnation as the world's policeman..and the idiotic wars we DIDN'T need to fight.. iraq being the prime example..saddam hussein deserved to go, but not necessarily at our hands..he had nothing to do with 9/11..he didn't even know what al-qaeda was uintil well into the war..

meanwhile, tghe war we SHOULD have been fighting.. the search for osama bin laxden, was allowed to languish almosty unnoticed..we're still there, propping up a corrupt, uselsess regime that wants to tell us how to fight, or not to fight..

why are we still there?..osama bin laden is fish food in the ocean.. he's dead and gone..we have no worries about the taliban..letjkarzai win or lose that one on his own..we need to get our people the hell out of afghanistan.. now..it's not our war..

doug

Reply
Comment_arrow

Batman

11:28 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

I agree that we need a clear objective when we send people to fight. We should have taken out the North Korean regime while we had a chance. Sooner or later it will have to be done. I don't have any friends or relatives in Korea. No reason for me to be concerned about them, except they are human beings. And no human being deserves to live under communism.

Comment_arrow

Things I Learned

5:23 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Saddam Hussein "didn't even know what al-qaeda was uintil well into the war.."

tom Comeau

11:51 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Nothing wrong with feeling sorry for whomever you wish, it's only when it takes the form of the government declaring war to straighten out the world that its wrong. There are oppressed people all over the world and its not our function or divine calling to cure the world's ills. We were not constituted as a nation for that purpose.
The manner in which you use the word 'communism' as if it's the world's biggest problem, indicates to me that you're just another victim of 1950's propaganda or what they then called the Red Scare. Most people drank that Kool Aid.
Communism is so damn bad that we're dealing extensively with communist China and communist Vietnam. In fact we're almost totally dependent on "communist" China! You've probably never lived under communism either so what is the basis of your fear or dislike of communism? Do you even know?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig Maxwell

10:54 am on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Admittedly, communism's a spent force in the world today. But it wasn't for most of the Twentieth century. In fact, with one hundred million victims, communism was the bloodiest ideology in human history. Hardly "1950's propaganda."

tom Comeau

12:48 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Have you ever even tried to rack up the victims of unregulated capitalism? Get real with the figures already!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig Maxwell

12:57 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

No, have you? Nor has capitalism ever been entirely unregulated. Nor is it an ideology. Communism's death toll has, on the other hand, been accurately tallied and is disputed by no one but its (increasingly rare) defenders.

tom Comeau

1:28 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

IH8whitepages, I don't know how much sensitivity you have a right to expect out of someone who was trained to kill; in any case sensitivity was never my long suit as I grow older I see less need for it. The fact that someone's uncle was included in the 58,000 who died needlessly, doesn't make him any less cannon fodder; that's what he was period!. if you feel badly about him in particular, take it up with those who were responsible , I was cannon fodder also, just luckier.

Reply

tom Comeau

1:52 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Craig , you're filled to overflowing with BS! Capitalism is damn sure an ideology,especially the latest version of the Ayn Rand "Hooray for me and screw the rest" variety. Communism's death toll has always been calculated by those in opposition to it, so the high figures are not surprising if remarkable. When I spoke of our death toll of 58,000 in Vietnam, I didn't mention the Vietnamese casualties which far exceed our own by a factor of ten to one, and get very little coverage by our media. The rest of the figures involving other wars are available assuming you're interested. We love to brag about those figures, it's what makes us so damn lovable in the eyes of the world. I'm not defending communism nor capitalism but anyone can successfully demonize any system; it's called propaganda and we have more than our share of it. What makes most right wing wackos appear so damn foolish is their incessant demonizing of socialism (which most can't even define) while mindlessly reaping in the rewards of it in so many ways in these United States.
You could lead them by the hand through the bank bailouts , the automobile company bailouts, the defense contractor bailouts, not to mention all the domestic social programs which have been in effect for years and they still wouldn't get it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig Maxwell

2:35 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Thank you for your kind comment.
Ayn Rand wrote books, Tom. Neither she nor anyone else has ever (thankfully, in my view!) implemented her ideas, and the pure, unregulated "capitalism" with which she is associated, is and will forever remain, a mere abstraction.
Communism, on the other hand, came terrifyingly close to realizing its philosophical designs. Mao and Stalin were, by far, history's greatest mass murderers, outstripping even Hitler. And Pol Pot holds the proud record for slaughtering the greatest percentage of his own population.
Most of those who first called the West's attention to the horrors behind the Iron Curtain--men like Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Czeslaw Milosz and Vaclav Havel--had experienced its brutalities first hand. Later, the scope of atrocities was well documented by scholars of every political persuasion. The best to date are books like The Black Book of Communism, (compiled by an international team of mostly Eastern European and French scholars) and Reflections on a Ravaged Century by Robert Conquest.

Comment_arrow

tom Comeau

4:17 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Craig, I need no primer on communism, or its advocates. As for Ayn Rand's "ideas" not being implemented, you're apparently unaware of T-party views, which they've made no attempt to hide. Many have quoted Rand's views and there's enough daily references to fill a book. True, no one has yet implemented all of her views, also true that no one has ever seen the pure form of any system but there's been enough of her influence to alert any thinking person. Rand Paul was not named after Keynes!
It was part of my duties while in the military to teach a course on Communism, for which I did my own research into its underlying philosophy (dialectical materialism). I presented it objectively and without automatic demonization, as a system. It was well received and I was pleased to receive an award reflecting that success. Of course there were those who saw an objective presentation of Communism, as a sign of satanic conversion on my part and notified the FBI which at the time, was forever looking for "reds" under every bed. So I was "investigated" and cleared of whatever the charge was. We're still under the shadow of the 50s Red Scare and our automatic response to communism is regrettably not much more advanced. Now the same demonization is being directed by the right wing nuts towards socialism, since communism's total collapse in the Soviet system. We will always have our bugaboos because we will always have our ambitious with their propagandists.

Comment_arrow

Things I Learned

8:48 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Communism's death toll is best calculated by communism's supporters.

Christal Ferris

2:28 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

I did not read all the comments. Too many. I will say, as someone who was enlisted in the military for 10 years and someone currently working for the military, there is an outrageous amount of frivilous spending.

As we speak, the base is putting in tons on artificial grass and landscaping that is absolutely unnecessary and pretending that it is to adhere to anti-terrorism force protection regulations. Really? Meanwhile, service members are taking advantage of free medical care, housing allowance, leave all on the taxpayers dime.

Everyday, I shake my head at the useless spending by our military. The defense budget is a joke.

Reply

tom Comeau

4:54 pm on Wednesday, August 3, 2011

IH8whitepages, where did you get the idea I was a "lib' as you've called it? Are you so damned narrow in your vision that anyone or everyone who disagrees with you is a "lib"? How do you get to be that narrow-minded? Is there somewhere a school in "selective blindness"? No wonder your group comes across as moronic. You richly deserve the likes of Bachman and Palin. You probably revere Limpbag, Hannity and Beck too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

IH8whitepages.com

10:55 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Hmmmmmmmm, let's see:
"Capitalism is damn sure an ideology,especially the latest version of the Ayn Rand "Hooray for me and screw the rest" variety. Communism's death toll has always been calculated by those in opposition to it, so the high figures are not surprising."

"You've probably never lived under communism either so what is the basis of your fear or dislike of communism? "

You don't know where I would get the idea you were liberal ?

Ramona Real Estate

9:52 pm on Sunday, August 14, 2011

From this exchange I understand why we are in the situation we are in. Ronald Reagan once said "It isn't that our liberal friends don't know a lot, it's that so much of what they know just isn't so." 1960 was the year.

Reply

tom Comeau

10:29 pm on Sunday, August 14, 2011

Reagan was a moron who read his lines well like the grade "B" actor that he was. He was a coward who, rather than serve in the military during WW2, decided that he'd rather make war movies for the government and so was automatically commissioned as a captain and the closest he got to any danger was struggling with the Santa Monica traffic. He never missed an opportunity to have himself photographed in his Army uniform so he could brag about his service. He was one of the original phonies during WW2 and we had more than enough of them. Lyndon Jonson was another phony who once arranged to "ride" in a Navy airplane into a active war zone for the express purpose of qualifying for a medal. IdiotBush was just a later incarnation of Reagan with his Air National guard "service"; he was a coward and a phony and used his daddy's connections to avoid real service. Our history is replete with prime bullshit artists like Reagan, IdiotBush, Johnson, and very little if any space is devoted to the real cannon fodder.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Things I Learned

1:19 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

1. a. Nearsighted people are cowards.
b. Nearsighted people who fake their eye exam to get into the army in wartime are cowards.
c. Ronald Reagan was an Army Captain who nonetheless did not serve in the military.
d. Producing classified training films with the hope of saving GI lives and shortening/winning a civilizational war is cowardly.
e. Being photographed in uniform as part of your job assignment is cowardly.

2. Burnishing your public service record is cowardly.

3. a. National Guard service is cowardly, phony "service."
b. Any idiot could fly the F-102, which was any extremely stable plane as evidenced by its nearly 30% accident rate and 70 dead pilots.
c. Joining a Guard squadron that flew 24-hour continental defense against Soviet incursions out of Cuba, while its parent group had F-102 pilots then in Vietnam, is cowardly.
d. Attempting to switch over to active Vietnam service via Palace Guard is cowardly.

tom Comeau

8:16 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Selective learning produces willful ignorance in which you appear to be totally immersed. You should seek employment with "Dunkin Donuts" Hunter staff; he's also adept at spinning facts.
Bush was and is a coward as is anyone else who either shirked his duty or took privileged steps to avoid the conscription that everyone else was exposed to. Any idiot could not fly the F-102, particularly IdotBush.
You haven't learned a thing, nor it seems are you capable of learning. You do best with propaganda in which you daily bathe.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Things I Learned

8:41 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

1. Anyone with incomplete knowledge is wilfully ignorant.
2. Spin is bad.
3. Bill Clinton is a coward.
4. Fake, but accurate.
5. George Bush did not fly the F-102.
6. If your primary news source is Patch, you will be bathed in propaganda.
7. ;-)

Ramona Real Estate

9:02 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Things I have learned. Not to seek real answers from someone vocally berating others. They tend not to be solution oriented.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tom Comeau

3:56 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

Some scumbags in government require a hell of a lot more than just verbal abuse; they need their heads unscrewed and drop-kicked into the next county. How's that for your tender sensitivities? How's that for a solution?

Babs

9:28 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

In a recent announcement of a plant closing, a CEO cried because he knew that he and his directors were putting his American employees out of a job. He said, that the reason the company was going offshore and employing a manufacturer outside the USofA were:

1. Material costs were cheaper than in the USA
2. Labor costs were cheaper than in the USA
3. Transportation costs were cheaper than in the USA
4. There were no unions demands than in the USA
5. Employee benefits were cheaper than in the USA
6. In order to remain competitive his products had to be cheaper than those produced and sold in the USA

It made business sense by moving his plants outside the USA.

He ended his announcement by saying this, "This has nothing to do with taxes in the USA, we will gladly continue to pay them, but taxes, or for that matter the potential for lower taxes had nothing to do with the decision.

The result is that this company did move offshore, now has more employees that it had before, is making more money than before and is paying taxes.

Question: How on earth can a businessman make the decision to move his company offshore when Republicans and Teabaggers keep yelling at the top of their lungs that "less taxes" and "less government" is the simplistic answer to improving the economy?

That CEO, his directors, his company and the reasons used to move offshore prove that these people are myopic to the idea of what makes a business operate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ramona Real Estate

10:08 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Not Taxes? Material costs are higher because of the cost to produce them, of which direct taxes are a componant but 'fees' associated with the environmental constraints that our foreign competitors do not have, are a heavy factor. Fees are taxes.
Labor costs: Government sanctioned fees and taxes
Transportation costs: Government sanctioned fees and taxes
Union demands: Government sanctioned overhead
Employee benefits: Government sanctioned overhead
Common thread? Had enough government yet?

Kevin Hippensteel

11:08 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

I would prefer if they had no or very low taxes on Companies. Companies just pass that cost on to customers and make our products less competitive to over seas companies. If we had no or very low tax rate all types of companies would be moving back to the USA. That would lead to a job boom.

Reply

Ramona Real Estate

12:27 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

I once listened to a man speak that had lived in the old Soviet Union between the early 70's thru the 80's. His comment on communism was that "the government pretended to take care of us, while we pretended to work." I really don't look forward to a system that, by it's own construction, defeats entrepreneurialism and promotes mediocrity.

Reply

Kevin Hippensteel

4:15 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

The new civil war is coming. We need to split the country between the producers ( those that work) and the losers those that can only take. Please don't give me that crap about people needing help. 10% of people need help and should be given it. The rest are losers how do explain generations of families being on welfare. Making people depended on the government is wrong for the country and bad for the people it says it wants to help.

Reply

Bryceson Cabading

4:35 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

New civil war? Give me a break. If you feel absolutely obligated to grab a gun and shoot people like a hillbilly coward, then maybe people like YOU are the problem. If you actually think that only 10% of people in this country need help, then maybe you haven't examined your surroundings clearly enough. Everyone nowadays needs help of some sort, whether it's paying the mortgage or trying to raise a family.

Reply

Tom Yarnall

7:23 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

Thank goodness we are still a democracy, perhaps marginally, and I can't wait for Nov 2012 to really see how the totality feel. If the Republicans gain control of congress and the presidency I think a suicide watch should be put on Doug"non-partisan" Curlee and many other extreme liberals.

Reply

tom Comeau

8:11 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

We are NOT a democracy and never have been! We are suppose to be a democratic Republic and we haven't been on of those either, and for a long time; what we are is a fascist empire with bases in hundreds of foreign countries where we conduct assassinations against peoples with whom we are not at war and for purposes which we cannot explain to our own people.
By the way, what the hell is an "extreme" liberal? Is he armed with a led pipe? Or with one of those beloved guns that Republicans can't seem to part with. You do not disappoint, you're as dim a bulb as the rest of the idiots in the Republican party.

Reply

Tom Yarnall

8:50 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

Thank goodness I don't have to depend on your types for my freedom and liberty.
I have submitted your name to the suicide watch registry, but you may want to consider a society that is more fitting for you like Venezuela, Syria, N Korea or Iran or you may want to consider England that has done away with guns. Things are going very well there, don't you think?
Bon voyage

Reply

tom Comeau

9:02 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

If you really think your freedom depends on what the military has been doing for the last 50 years, you're a blithering idiot and not worth further communication. Get lost.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Yarnall

9:43 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

I don't think my freedom depends solely on the military .It depends on the proper execution of the intent and articles of our Constitution. You may want to review them.
A person who resorts to name calling and character assassination indicates a shallow thinker, so I will get lost since you have nothing of value to add to my base of knowledge, however small it is.
Bon voyage

Ramona Real Estate

9:49 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

And there you have it, folks. A country divided. It's been three generations in the works, beginning with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913, and the creation at that point of a debt based nation. We've been had by the world banks and oil companies while we argue over the placement of deck chairs on the Titanic. The problem is borrowing and spending. Until we address the problem, we are lost. Look up the Creature from Jekyl Island and study how the Federal Reserve System came to be. The Dept of Education has seen to the dumbing down of three generations. It may well be too late.

Reply

tom Comeau

6:56 am on Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Yes Yarnall, the truth comes out in moments of unguarded insight, your base of knowledge is indeed small. And your precious Constitution has been done away with during the last administration of the IdiotBush dynasty that you hailed as Texan but was really an idiot son of the elite clan from Connecticutt. Remember "it's just a pice of paper"? Enjoy your ignorance and misery.

Reply

Leave a comment